Testing a Website as a Developer – A User-Centric Approach

Rajiv
1d
154
0
1
25
Blog

Introduction

As developers, we often focus on building functional websites—writing clean code, optimizing performance, and ensuring the backend and frontend work seamlessly. But how often do we step into the shoes of the user? Testing a website isn’t just about debugging code; it’s about ensuring the experience is intuitive, reliable, and enjoyable for the end user. In this blog, I’ll walk you through my process of testing a website as a developer, blending technical rigor with a user-first mindset. Plus, I’ll share a simple C# tool I built to automate part of the process—source code included!

Why Test from a User’s Perspective?

Users don’t care about your elegant algorithms or perfectly structured database—they care about whether the site works, loads quickly, and meets their needs. A developer’s testing approach should mirror this reality. By testing with the user in mind, we catch issues like broken navigation, slow load times, or confusing error messages that automated unit tests might miss.

Step 1. Define the User’s Journey.

Before writing a single test, I ask: What does the user want to do? For a sample e-commerce site, the journey might be,

Browse products.
Add items to a cart.
Check out and pay.

From this, I create a checklist.

Can the user find products easily?
Does the cart update correctly?
Is the checkout process smooth?

Step 2. Manual Testing – Be the User.

I start by manually navigating the site as if I’m a user. For example, on my sample site (a simple product catalog), I.

Click every button (e.g., “Add to Cart”).
Enter invalid data (e.g., “abc” in a quantity field).
Test edge cases (e.g., adding 999 items to the cart).

Observations

The “Add to Cart” button worked, but there was no confirmation message—users might wonder if it succeeded.
Entering invalid data crashed the page—definitely not user-friendly!

Manual testing catches UX issues that automated scripts might overlook

Step 3. Automated Testing with Tools.

As a developer, I lean on automation to save time and ensure consistency. For this blog, I wrote a simple C# console app to test the website’s availability and response time—key factors in user satisfaction. Here’s how it works:

It pings the website’s URL.
It measures how long the response takes.
It logs the results.

Below is the source code for this tool.

using System;
using System.Net.Http;
using System.Diagnostics;
using System.Threading.Tasks;

namespace WebsiteTester
{
    class Program
    {
        static async Task Main(string[] args)
        {
            string url = "https://example.com"; // Replace with your website URL
            Console.WriteLine($"Testing website: {url}");

            try
            {
                using (HttpClient client = new HttpClient())
                {
                    client.Timeout = TimeSpan.FromSeconds(10); // Set timeout to simulate user patience

                    Stopwatch stopwatch = Stopwatch.StartNew();
                    HttpResponseMessage response = await client.GetAsync(url);
                    stopwatch.Stop();

                    if (response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
                    {
                        Console.WriteLine($"Status: Success (Code: {(int)response.StatusCode})");
                        Console.WriteLine($"Response Time: {stopwatch.ElapsedMilliseconds} ms");
                    }
                    else
                    {
                        Console.WriteLine($"Status: Failed (Code: {(int)response.StatusCode})");
                    }
                }
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                Console.WriteLine($"Error: {ex.Message}");
            }
        }
    }
}

How to Use It?

Replace https://example.com with your site’s URL.
Run the app—it’ll tell you if the site is up and how fast it responds.
If it takes >2 seconds, users might get frustrated—time to optimize!

Step 4. Simulate Real-World Conditions.

Users don’t always have perfect Wi-Fi or the latest browsers. I test.

Slow Networks: Using browser dev tools to throttle speed—does the site still load?
Old Browsers: I check compatibility on older versions (e.g., Edge 18, Chrome 90).
Mobile Devices: I resize the window and use emulators—does the layout break?

For my sample site, the product images didn’t load on a throttled connection. I optimized them by compressing files, a win for users.

Step 5. Validate Feedback and Error Handling.

Users hate cryptic errors. I intentionally break things.

Enter a wrong password—does it say “Incorrect credentials” or just “Error 500”?
Submit an empty form—does it guide the user to fill it out?

On my site, an empty checkout form returned a blank page. I fixed it to show, “Please fill in all fields”—clear and helpful.

Step 6. Performance Matters.

Users abandon slow sites. I use tools like Lighthouse (in Chrome DevTools) to check.

Page load time.
Time to interactive (when buttons work).
Image optimization.

After minifying CSS and lazy-loading images, it will almost hit 92/100—users will notice the difference.

Lessons Learned

Testing as a developer with a user’s perspective bridges the gap between code and experience. The C# tool I shared is just one piece—combine it with manual checks, real-world simulations, and performance audits for a well-rounded approach.