Part - 1 - Introduction
The normal equation is a more closed-form solution of figuring out the value of parameter or θ that minimizes the cost function. It's called a closed-form solution in the sense that it gives the result directly through the equation.
Here,
- The left-hand side of the equation is the value of q that's going to minimize the cost function
- y is a vector containing our target values or labels
Part - 2 - Data generation
Now, we need data on which we can apply the Normal Equation. Let's create some random data. We need to make sure that the data plot isn't a glorious line, so we're adding some noise to scatter them or create some deviation.
- import numpy as np
-
- def generate_data():
- X = 2 * np.random.rand(100, 1)
- y = 4 + 3 * X + np.random.randn(100, 1)
-
-
-
-
-
- return X, y
Now that our data is created, it is time to fetch our parameters from this dataset. Or we can say getting a value of q that will minimize the cost function.
Part - 3 - Getting
So how do we find the best q? We will use the normal equation.
from numpy.linalg import inv
- def get_best_param(X, y):
- X_transpose = X.T
- best_params = inv(X_transpose.dot(X)).dot(X_transpose).dot(y)
-
-
-
- return best_params
Part - 4 - Testing
We have our data, we have ๐, so let's test things!
- X, y = generate_data()
- %matplotlib inline
- import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
-
- plt.plot(X, y, "r.")
Had we not chosen to add some noise, this data would've been a dead straight line, and then we wouldn't need fancy machine learning. Simple math would do. [ Apparently, we're not here for that ]
- X_b = np.c_[np.ones((100, 1)), X]
- params = get_best_param(X_b, y)
- print(params)
- array([[ 3.94204397],
- [ 3.08256508]])
Well, the expected values would've been 4 and 3 but we have some noise so deviation is acceptable. [ I'm not saying this is perfect! ]
So how do we get the prediction? Well, another equation,
Here,
- The left-hand side of the equation is the expected output,
-
-
- test_X = np.array([[0], [2]])
- test_X_b = np.c_[np.ones((2, 1)), test_X]
-
- prediction = test_X_b.dot(params)
-
-
- print(prediction)
- array([[ 3.94204397],
- [ 10.10717414]])
Okay numbers numbers all around. So let's plot the prediction and our dataset in a single graph and see how the model fits the dataset for a regression problem.
- plt.plot(test_X, prediction, "r--")
- plt.plot(X, y, "b.")
- plt.axis([0, 2, 0, 15])
- plt.show()
So, we implemented Normal Equation and applied it to predict output for a Linear regression problem. So one curious question - what if we didn't add noise? How would the data plot look? let's find out!
Extra - What if no noise?
- def generate_noiseless_data():
- X = 2 * np.random.rand(100, 1)
- y = 4 + 3 * X
-
-
-
-
-
- return X, y
- X, y = generate_noiseless_data()
- plt.plot(X, y, "r.")
- [<matplotlib.lines.Line2D at 0x10f30f978>]
As you can see - a dead straight line (almost!) let's look at the param and prediction
- X_b = np.c_[np.ones((100, 1)), X] # set bias term to 1 for each sample
- param = get_best_param(X_b, y)
- param
- array([[ 4.],
- [ 3.]])
Well well, exactly 4 and 3. For such cases, you don't need machine learning. Just putting values in the line equation does the job.
- test_X = np.array([[0], [2]])
- test_X_b = np.c_[np.ones((2, 1)), test_X]
-
- prediction = test_X_b.dot(params)
- plt.plot(test_X, prediction, "r--")
- plt.plot(X, y, "b.")
- plt.axis([0, 2, 0, 15]) # x axis range 0 to 2, y axis range 0 to 15
- plt.show()
Nothing to separate really!