1. π Folders: Classic and Simple
Best for: Smaller libraries with a clear structure
Folders are intuitive and familiar, great for straightforward use. But beware: deeply nested structures can make navigation and retrieval tedious.
Pro tip: Keep folder levels shallow to avoid complexity and improve search efficiency.
2. π· Metadata (Columns): Tag Your Files Effectively
Best for: Medium to large libraries with evolving needs
Instead of relying on folder hierarchies, tag documents using metadata like Client, Project, or Status. The benefits:
- Easier filtering and sorting
- Flexible, dynamic views
- Enhanced search accuracy
Example: Use “Region = APAC” and “Year = 2025” tags for invoices, instead of separate folders.
3. π Content Types: Tailored Document Templates
Best for: Libraries with diverse document types
Content Types allow you to create specific templates and metadata sets, like “Invoice” or “Contract.” This is helpful when:
- Documents need distinct metadata fields
- You want uniform templates and workflows
- You’re managing multiple document formats in one library
Tip: Attach workflows or retention policies directly to content types for consistent behavior.
4. π Document Sets: Bundle and Manage Together
Best for: Projects or cases containing multiple files
Document Sets are like smart folders: a single container with shared metadata and versions, ideal for grouped documents.
Scenario: A “Project A” Document Set might contain proposal, contract, and status files—all tracked together.
β
Best Practices for Your SharePoint Library
- Steer clear of deep folder trees—use metadata instead
- Opt for Content Types when documents require specific structures or templates
- Bundle related files using Document Sets
- Build custom views to help users find files quickly and intuitively
π§ Final Take
Select the structure that fits your organizational needs: metadata and content types offer the most scalable and flexible solution, while folders and document sets are useful for simpler or grouped content scenarios.