Difference Between StringBuffer and StringBuilder Class

Difference Between StringBuffer and StringBuilder Class

 

 

Figure 1 String

 

The following are the differences.

 

No	StringBuffer	StringBuilder
1	StringBuffer class is synchronized	StringBuilder class is not synchronized
2	It is thread-safe	It is not thread-safe
3	It is slower than StringBuilder	It is faster than StringBuffer
4	It is available from Java 1.0	It is available from Java 5.0

 

Synchronization, thread safety & speed

• StringBuffer is synchronized, that's why it is also thread-safe. In other words, two or more threads cannot call the methods of StringBuffer simultaneously.
  In a synchronized environment, a single thread can perform a certain operation rather than disturbing any other thread that makes StringBuffer slower because it is synchronized.
• StringBuilder is not synchronized and that's why it is not thread-safe. That means that two or more threads can call the methods of StringBuilder simultaneously. Since it is non-synchronized and not thread-safe, it can perform faster because there is no overhead of acquiring and releasing of locks associated with synchronized methods (StringBuffer).

Note: The only similarity between the two is that they both are mutable.

 

Preference

 

All the operations (excluding performance) are nearly similar in both classes. When we need to choose on the basis of thread safety and you want that operation should be thread-safe, then StringBuffer is a good option. Otherwise in all other cases, StringBuilder will be the best option since it gives better performance with all the functionality.

 

StringBuffer & StringBuilder performance test

 

public class PerformanceTest
{
    public static void main(String[] args)
    {
        long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
        StringBuffer strbuff = new StringBuffer("Dark");
        for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++)
        {
            strbuff.append("Night");
        }
        System.out.println("Time taken by StringBuffer: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime) + "ms");
        startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
        StringBuilder strbuild = new StringBuilder("Dark");
        for (int i = 0; i < 10000; i++) {
            strbuild.append("Night");
        }
        System.out.println("Time taken by StringBuilder: " + (System.currentTimeMillis() - startTime) + "ms");
    }
}

Output

 

 

Figure 2 Output Performance Test

 

You can see that, StringBuilder is faster than StringBuffer since it is performed in 0ms whereas StringBuffer is performed in 15ms.

 

Conclusion

Parameters	String	StringBuffer	StringBuilder
Modifiable	No(immutable)	Yes(mutable)	Yes(mutable)
Thread-safety	Yes	Yes	No
Storage area	Constant string pool	Heap	Heap
Synchronization	Yes	Yes	No
Performance	Slow	Fast	Very fast
Availability	Always	1.0	5.0
Overrides equals() and hashCode() method	Yes	No	No

 

Thank you, keep learning and sharing.