TECHNOLOGIES
FORUMS
JOBS
BOOKS
EVENTS
INTERVIEWS
Live
MORE
LEARN
Training
CAREER
MEMBERS
VIDEOS
NEWS
BLOGS
Sign Up
Login
No unread comment.
View All Comments
No unread message.
View All Messages
No unread notification.
View All Notifications
Answers
Post
An Article
A Blog
A News
A Video
An EBook
An Interview Question
Ask Question
Forums
Monthly Leaders
Forum guidelines
james
NA
1.1k
334.1k
VB.NET
Oct 7 2003 9:24 AM
I know VB was huge, and many wannabe-programmers made a very good living slopping apps together in VB6, but why would Microsoft carry over so much of that into VB.NET? The reason I'm venting here is because I have a coworker who is taking a beginning VB.NET class. Rather than teaching Objects, and good codiing practices, that are hacking it up the same way VB6 used to do. And Microsoft has enabled them to do so but keeping the syntax of Subs and Functions around. Here I am trying to explain to my coworker what a constructor is, what a method is (as opposed to a function) and I'm just confusing her more because the language itself has not lent itself to actually presenting what is going on under the hood. Okay, I'm just venting... -James
Reply
Answers (
6
)
Question of the Day 10-07-03
23 C# Code Samples from Microsoft...