TECHNOLOGIES
FORUMS
JOBS
BOOKS
EVENTS
INTERVIEWS
Live
MORE
LEARN
Training
CAREER
MEMBERS
VIDEOS
NEWS
BLOGS
Sign Up
Login
No unread comment.
View All Comments
No unread message.
View All Messages
No unread notification.
View All Notifications
Answers
Post
An Article
A Blog
A News
A Video
An EBook
An Interview Question
Ask Question
Forums
Monthly Leaders
Forum guidelines
Guest User
Tech Writer
357
120.8k
In and Out Generic Modifier
Jun 13 2012 12:49 PM
Hi
Given the following 2 code examples:-
// Covariant interface.
interface ICovariant<out R> { }
// Implementing covariant interface.
class Sample<R> : ICovariant<R> { }
class Program
{
static void Test()
{
ICovariant<Object> iobj = new Sample<Object>();
ICovariant<String> istr = new Sample<String>();
// You can assign istr to iobj because
// the ICovariant interface is covariant.
iobj = istr;
}
}
/ Contravariant interface.
interface IContravariant<in A> { }
// Implementing contravariant interface.
class Sample<A> : IContravariant<A> { }
class Program
{
static void Test()
{
IContravariant<Object> iobj = new Sample<Object>();
IContravariant<String> istr = new Sample<String>();
// You can assign iobj to istr because
// the IContravariant interface is contravariant.
istr = iobj;
}
}
I thought Contravariance was Narrower (string) to Wider (object) and Covariance was Wider (object) to Narrower (string).
With the assignments above it indicates the vice versa?
Regards
Steven
Reply
Answers (
3
)
how to find the resolution of the images by using silverlight?
Passing Values between user Controls in Silverlight Appplication