TECHNOLOGIES
FORUMS
JOBS
BOOKS
EVENTS
INTERVIEWS
Live
MORE
LEARN
Training
CAREER
MEMBERS
VIDEOS
NEWS
BLOGS
Sign Up
Login
No unread comment.
View All Comments
No unread message.
View All Messages
No unread notification.
View All Notifications
Answers
Post
An Article
A Blog
A News
A Video
An EBook
An Interview Question
Ask Question
Forums
Monthly Leaders
Forum guidelines
Olivier Muhring
NA
150
9.9k
I'm currently working on a small mvc project. On itself nothing special, I'm a big supporter of the ...
Jun 15 2012 11:10 AM
I have datalayer which uses EF 4.1 to communicate with a database. On top op this I've added a datamodel-project, which basically translates between EF's POCO-classes and the DTO-objects I use further along in the application (business and UI)
I'm doing this straightforward, manually mapping and creating my objects as I go along. I've used this approach, with great success, in several other projects. In my current project however, a colleague has made several objections. She thinks working my way would in essence mean throwing away a lot of the power of the Entity Framework. To circumvent this, she wants to write a wrapper around my POCO or my DTO classes (not sure which) and use that wrapper to write a convertor, so as to automatically map my POCO classes to their DTO counterparts and so on.
I personally believe this to be overkill, but I do understand her objections.
In some fields of C# I'm still somewhat of a novice so far, so I'm at a loss at what to do now. How you undertake writing a wrapper (what is wrapper anyway) around a class, and then how do you write a converter?
Reply
Answers (
2
)
To var or not to var
clearing a text box for calculation