Generics in C# allow you to define classes, methods, and interfaces with a placeholder for the type of data they store or use. This flexibility enables you to write more general and reusable code. However, sometimes you need to restrict the types that can be used with generics to ensure certain operations are safe or possible. This is where generic constraints come into play.
In this article, we’ll explore the various constraints that can be applied to generic type parameters in C#, providing complete examples for each.
1. where T: struct
The struct
constraint ensures that the type parameter is a value type. This is useful when you want to ensure the generic type is a non-nullable value type like int
, float
, or a custom struct.
2. where T: class
The class
constraint ensures that the type parameter is a reference type. This is useful for ensuring the type is a class, interface, delegate, or array.
3. where T: new()
The new()
constraint ensures that the type parameter has a public parameterless constructor. This is useful when you need to create instances of the generic type within the class.
4. where T: <base class>
This constraint ensures that the type parameter is a specific class or derives from a specific base class.
5. where T: <interface>
The interface constraint ensures that the type parameter implements a specific interface.
6. where T: unmanaged
The unmanaged
constraint ensures that the type parameter is an unmanaged type, which includes simple types like int
, float
, char
, pointers, and enums.
7. where T: <type parameter name>
This constraint ensures that the type parameter is the same as or inherits from another type parameter.
8. where T: class, new()
This constraint ensures that the type parameter is a reference type and has a public parameterless constructor.
Github Project Link
Conclusion
Generic constraints in C# are powerful tools that allow you to enforce certain conditions on the types used with your generic classes, methods, and interfaces. By using constraints like struct
, class
, new()
, and others, you can ensure that your generic code is both flexible and type-safe, allowing for more robust and maintainable applications.