Blue Theme Orange Theme Green Theme Red Theme
 
World Class ASP.NET Hosting – Click Here for 3 Months Free/NO Setup Fee!
Home | Forums | Videos | Photos | Downloads | Blogs | Interviews | Jobs | Beginners | Training
 | Consulting  
Submit an Article Submit a Blog 
 Login Close
User Id:
Password:
 
Forgot Password
Forgot Username
Why Register
 Jump to
Skip Navigation Links
TechnologyExpand Technology
WebsiteExpand Website
 Resources  
Close
 Our Network  
Close
Search :       Advanced Search »
Home » .NET 3.0/3.5 » Downcasting in C#

Downcasting in C#

This article describes a simple approach to downcasting in C#; downcasting merely refers to the process of casting an object of a base class type to a derived class type. Upcasting is legal in C# as the process there is to convert an object of a derived class type into an object of its base class type. In spite of the general illegality of downcasting you may find that when working with generics it is sometimes handy to do it anyway.

Author Rank:
Total page views :  4601
Total downloads :  42
   Print Read/Post comments Post a comment  Similar Articles  
   Email to a friend  Bookmark  Author's other articles  
Download Files:
DowncastingCS.zip
 
Become a Sponsor


Introduction

This article describes a simple approach to downcasting in C#; downcasting merely refers to the process of casting an object of a base class type to a derived class type. Upcasting is legal in C# as the process there is to convert an object of a derived class type into an object of its base class type. In spite of the general illegality of downcasting you may find that when working with generics it is sometimes handy to do it anyway.



Figure 1: Test Application in Use

The Solution

The example solution provided is in the form of a console mode application; the entire solution is contained within the program.cs file.
 
The Code

The Program.cs file contains two classes used to provide an example of a base class and a derived class. They are the person class (the base) and the lawyer class (derived from person). The person contains some basic information about a person whilst the lawyer class contains a couple of a additional properties:

    public class Person
    {
        public string FirstName { get; set; }
        public string MiddleName { get; set; }
        public string LastName { get; set; }
        public int Age { get; set; }
    }

    public class Lawyer : Person
    {
        public int NumberOfPeopleShafted { get; set; }
        public int NumberOfLiesTold { get; set; }
    }

What now makes this all interesting is if we wanted to use a single method to save either a person or a lawyer (I'm going out on a limb here in indicating that lawyers inherit from persons). To illustrate the point, I built a static class entitled, "PeopleHandler". The sole method contained in this class can accept either a person or one of person's derived class which is in this case only lawyers. Now, if we pass the following method a object of the person type, everything is fine and all properties are visible in the code. However, if we pass in object of the lawyer type (the derived class), the object is treated as a person rather than a lawyer and the other lawyer properties are invisible to the code even though the lawyer object passed to the "SavePerson" method contains both properties. Since downcasting is not permitted, it is necessary to cast the lawyer as a lawyer rather than as a person; unfortunately, that does not work.

If you tried this: "(Lawyer)pers", the code would show an error indicating that one cannot cast T as a lawyer. Well, in this case, we know full well that "pers" is really a lawyer and not a person so it would be really helpful if we could use it as a lawyer rather than as a person.

In the following bit of code (highlighted) you can see a solution to the dilemma and it is pretty easy, just convert the lawyer to an object and then cast is over to lawyer; that works. After doing that, you will find that you can access the additional properties of the lawyer without difficulty. To avoid any problems with that, I get the type of object passed into the method and use a switch statement to limit my attempts to read lawyer properties to lawyer objects only.

The code that I used is provided in the following:

    public static class PeopleHandler
    {
        public static void SavePerson<T>(T pers) where T : Person
        {

            Type tPers = pers.GetType();
            string[] arr = tPers.ToString().Split('.');
            string personType = arr[arr.Length - 1];

            int mAge = pers.Age;
            string mFirstName = pers.FirstName;
            string mMiddleName = pers.MiddleName;
            string mLastName = pers.LastName;

            switch (personType)
            {
                case "Person":
                    Console.WriteLine("Save Type: " + personType);
                    Console.WriteLine("Name: " + mFirstName + " " +
                    mMiddleName + " " + mLastName);
                    Console.WriteLine("Age: " + mAge.ToString());
                    break;
                case "Lawyer":
                    Console.WriteLine("Save Type: " + personType);
                    Console.WriteLine("Name: " + mFirstName + " " +
                    mMiddleName + " " + mLastName);
                    Console.WriteLine("Age: " + mAge.ToString());
                    Console.WriteLine("Number of Clients Shafted: " +
                    ((Lawyer)(Object)pers).NumberOfPeopleShafted);
                    Console.WriteLine("Number of Lies Told: " +
                    ((Lawyer)(Object)pers).NumberOfLiesTold);
                    break;
                default:
                    break;
            } 
        }
    }

The Program Class

The program class itself is used to test the People Handler's "SavePerson" method by passing it an object of type person and an object of type lawyer. The results of running the executable will display information about both the person and lawyer objects passed to the method.

    
public class Program
    {
        static void Main(string[] args)
        {
            Person MacDuff = new Person();
            MacDuff.Age = 44;
            MacDuff.FirstName = "Alexander";
            MacDuff.MiddleName = "Hercules";
            MacDuff.LastName = "MacDuff";

            PeopleHandler.SavePerson(MacDuff);

            Console.WriteLine(Environment.NewLine);

            Lawyer creep = new Lawyer();
            creep.FirstName = "Gordon";
            creep.MiddleName = "Bud";
            creep.LastName = "Miller";
            creep.Age = 50;
            creep.NumberOfLiesTold = 100000;
            creep.NumberOfPeopleShafted = 5000;

            PeopleHandler.SavePerson(creep);

            Console.Read();
        }
    }

Summary

This example provided an approach to downcasting; the article provides an example showing how downcasting might be useful when saving base and derived class objects using a common save method.


Login to add your contents and source code to this article
 About the author
 
Scott Lysle
Freelance software developer residing in Alabama. Bachelors, Masters Degrees from Wichita State University. I spent the first half of my career working on aircraft controls and displays and in that time I worked on the cockpits for the OH-58 AHIP, the AH-1W, the V-22, the F-22, the C-130J, the C-5 AMP, AWACS, JPATS, and a few others. Since 1997 I have been largely involved with Windows and web development, GIS application development, consumer electronics development (embedded linux/java), but still sometimes work on aircraft and military projects, the most recent of which was the presidential transport helicopter. I tend to work primarily with C/C++, Java, VB, and C#.
Looking for C# Consulting?
C# Consulting is founded in 2002 by the founders of C# Corner. Unlike a traditional consulting company, our consultants are well-known experts in .NET and many of them are MVPs, authors, and trainers. We specialize in Microsoft .NET development and utilize Agile Development and Extreme Programming practices to provide fast pace quick turnaround results. Our software development model is a mix of Agile Development, traditional SDLC, and Waterfall models.
Click here to learn more about C# Consulting.
 
Introducing MaxV - one click. infinite control. Hyper-V Hosting from MaximumASP.
Finally – a virtual platform that delivers next-generation Windows Server 2008 Hyper-V virtualization technology from a managed hosting partner you can truly depend on. Visit www.maximumasp.com/max for a FREE 30 day trial. Hurry offer ends soon. Climb aboard the MaxV platform and take advantage of High Availability, Intelligent Monitoring, Recurrent Backups, and Scalability – with no hassle or hidden fees. As a managed hosting partner focused solely on Microsoft technologies since 2000, MaximumASP is uniquely qualified to provide the superior support that our business is built on. Unparalleled expertise with Microsoft technologies lead to working directly with Microsoft as first to offer IIS 7 and SQL 2008 betas in a hosted environment; partnering in the Go Live Program for Hyper-V; and product co-launches built on WS 2008 with Hyper-V technology.
Dynamic PDF
ceTE software specializes in components for dynamic PDF generation and manipulation. The DynamicPDF™ product line allows you to dynamically generate PDF documents, merge PDF documents and new content to existing PDF documents from within your applications.
Go.NET
Build custom interactive diagrams, network, workflow editors, flowcharts, or software design tools. Includes many predefined kinds of nodes, links, and basic shapes. Supports layers, scrolling, zooming, selection, drag-and-drop, clipboard, in-place editing, tooltips, grids, printing, overview window, palette. 100% implemented in C# as a managed .NET Control. Document/View/Tool architecture with many properties&events. Optional automatic layout.
Dundas Software
Dundas Chart for .NET is the most advanced .NET charting package available today.  With an extremely complete feature set, elegant architecture and easy implementation, Dundas Chart can quickly add advanced Charting functionality to enhance and transform ASP.NET and Windows Forms applications.  Whether you are implementing charting into internal projects, or building applications for clients, Dundas Chart offers advanced technology and advanced results to get the most out of data.
Clickatell's SMS Gateway
Clickatell's Developer Solutions allow you to SMS enable any website or application via a range of API's. Learn More about our API connections.
Free access to .NET Memory Management video
Everything you need to know about Garbage Collection, Temporary Objects, Fragmentation, Finalization and common causes of memory leaks in .NET. Watch the video here.
Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 Professional
Microsoft Visual Studio 2010 Professional will launch on April 12, but you can beat the rush and secure your copy today by pre-ordering at the affordable estimated retail price of $549 (US). Pre-order now.
Nevron Chart for .NET 2010.1 Now Available
The leading .NET charting control now features PDF, Flash and Silverlight export, visualization of large datasets and more. Deliver true charting functionality to your BI, Scorecard, Presentation or Scientific apps. Download evaluation now.
Developer-Ready ASP.NET 2.0 Web Hosting with 3 MONTHS FREE
Now supporting .NET 3.0 Framework with Windows Workflow Foundation, Windows Communication Foundation (WCF), Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF), windows CardSpace (WCS)! Providing more flexibility for Developers with Web Services Support and a User/Permission Manger. Also supporting MS SQL 2005/2000 with Real-Time Backups, FREE Automated Attach .MDF Tool, FREE SQL Restore and Shrink SQL DB Tools, and SQL
 
   Print Read/Post comments Post a comment  Similar Articles  
   Email to a friend  Bookmark  Author's other articles  
Download Files:
DowncastingCS.zip
 
 Post a Feedback, Comment, or Question about this article
Subject:  
Comment:  
Become a Sponsor
 Comments
Polymorphism is better by Peter On March 2, 2009
Polymorphism is the object-oriented method of doing this. You should have one method per case. You've got this use issue that the textual name you're comparing against is decoupled from the type name. If you changed the name of your type then you'd have runtime errors. Using polymorphism gets you compile-time checking. Not to mention, what method that gets called is decided upon compilation and no string comparison would be needed.
Reply | Email | Delete | Modify | 
Re: Polymorphism is better by Scott On March 2, 2009
It is if the architect does not require a single save method on the base class that handles all of the derived classes. I put this out there due to rather large and unresolved number of blog entries I encountered from people looking for a way to do exactly this. This is not preferred way of doing business and if it were it would not be prevented so naturally you are correct in what you've said, but if you don't have the luxury of being correct, this works.
Reply | Email | Delete | Modify | 

 Hosted by MaximumASP  |  Found a broken link?  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & conditions  |  Privacy Policy  |  Site Map  |  Suggest an Idea  |  Media Kit
Current Version: 5.2009.6.2
 © 2010  contents copyright of their authors. Rest everything copyright Mindcracker. All rights reserved.